Petricor

Fungi and Mold - Analysis
And Management

Discover
Explore
Test
Refine
Implement
Objective
Activities:
Output:
Feedback
Conduct user research (interviews, surveys, ethnographic studies), stakeholder interviews, market analysis, and competitive analysis.
Personas, user journey maps, problem statements, and research insights.
This step is crucial for setting a strong foundation. Ensure you gather diverse perspectives and validate assumptions with real user data.
Understand the problem space, user needs, and business goals.

Problem Statement

Fungi and mold analysis in microbiology laboratories is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process that involves multiple steps, from sample preparation to data analysis. Manual methods are prone to human error and variability, leading to inconsistent results and prolonged turnaround times.

Additionally, the increasing volume of samples in both clinical and environmental settings demands higher throughput and efficiency. There is a need for an automated system that can streamline the entire workflow, from sample preparation to final reporting, to enhance accuracy, reduce labor costs, and improve overall productivity.

Product Brief

Objective:

To develop an automated system for fungi and mold analysis that improves accuracy, consistency, and efficiency in microbiology laboratories, reducing the time and labor involved in the process.

Automated Sample Handling: Automated plating and incubation.Integrated sterile techniques to prevent contamination.

Imaging and Analysis: High-resolution imaging for detailed colony morphology.Advanced image processing software for accurate colony counting and classification.

Identification: AI and ML algorithms for rapid and precise identification of fungal species.Integrated databases for reference comparison.

Data Management: Automated data recording and integration with LIMS.Real-time updates and easy data retrieval.

Quality Control: Continuous monitoring and calibration of equipment.Automated alerts for equipment maintenance and calibration.

Reporting: Automated report generation with comprehensive analysis.Customizable report formats for different stakeholders.

Benefits:

Improved Accuracy and Consistency: Reduces human error and variability, ensuring reliable results.

Increased Efficiency: Significantly reduces the time required for analysis, allowing for higher throughput.

Cost Savings: Lower long-term operational costs due to reduced labor and increased efficiency.

Scalability: Easily scalable to handle increasing volumes of samples without a proportional increase in labor.

Enhanced Data Management: Streamlined data recording, retrieval, and reporting, integrating seamlessly with existing lab systems.

Dr. Alex Morgan - Persona

Age

34

Job Title

Senior Microbiologist

Education

- Ph.D. in Microbiology from Stanford University
- M.Sc. in Biomedical Sciences from Johns Hopkins University
- B.Sc. in Biology from the University of California, Berkeley

Experience:

- 10+ years of experience in microbiology research and clinical diagnostics
- 5 years managing laboratory teams and overseeing microbiological studies
- Extensive experience in both manual and automated microbiological analysis

Goals:

- To improve the accuracy and efficiency of microbiological analyses
- To stay updated with the latest advancements in microbiology and lab automation
- To contribute to significant scientific discoveries and advancements
- To mentor junior scientists and foster a collaborative lab environment

Tools and Technologies:

- Familiar with laboratory information management systems (LIMS)
- Skilled in using automated colony counters, plate readers, and imaging systems
- Proficient in statistical analysis software (e.g., SPSS, R)Experienced with molecular biology tools (PCR, sequencing)

Responsibilities:

- Overseeing the preparation and analysis of microbial samples
- Ensuring the proper incubation and monitoring of cultures
- Performing both manual and automated colony counting and identification
- Maintaining accurate and comprehensive records of all lab activities
- Ensuring all equipment is sterilized and quality control procedures are followed
- Analyzing data and generating detailed reports for internal and external stakeholders
- Collaborating with peers for peer review and verification of resultsContinuously improving lab processes and integrating new technologies

Challenges:

- Managing the balance between manual and automated processes
- Ensuring consistent and reliable results despite potential equipment malfunctions
- Keeping up with the fast-paced advancements in microbiological technologies
- Handling the administrative workload associated with documentation and reporting

Needs:

- Access to state-of-the-art laboratory equipment and technologies
- Continuous training and professional development opportunities
- Efficient and user-friendly laboratory information management systems
- Supportive and collaborative work environment

Dr. Emily Thompson - Persona

Age

42

Job Title

Senior Mycologist

Education

- Ph.D. in Mycology, University of California, Berkeley
- M. Sc Microbiology University California, San Diego
- B. Sc Human Biology Oberlin College

Experience:

- Over 15 years in fungal research
- Published numerous papers in top scientific journals
- Led multidisciplinary research teams

Goals:

- To improve the accuracy and efficiency of microbiological analyses
- To stay updated with the latest advancements in microbiology and lab automation
- To contribute to significant scientific discoveries and advancements
- To mentor junior scientists and foster a collaborative lab environment

Tools and Technologies:

- High-resolution microscopes
- Genetic sequencing tools
- Data analysis softwareField research equipment

Responsibilities:

-Conducts advanced research on fungal species and their ecological impact
- Leads a team of researchers in the laboratory and in the field
- Develops and tests new methods for fungal cultivation and analysis
- Publishes research findings and presents at scientific conferences
- Mentors junior scientists and students

Challenges:

- Securing funding for extensive research projects
- Keeping up with the latest technological advancements in mycology
- Balancing administrative duties with research activities

Needs:

- Advanced imaging and analysis tools
- Access to a comprehensive fungal species database
- Efficient data management and collaboration platforms

Dr. Jane Miller - Persona

Age

38

Job Title

Environmental Mycologist

Education

- Ph.D. in Mycology, University of California, Berkeley
- M. Sc University of Wisconsin-Madison
- B. Sc Biology University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Experience:

- 12 years of research in fungal ecology and environmental impact
- Published multiple papers on fungal roles in ecosystem sustainability
- Collaborated with various environmental organizations on conservation projects

Goals:

- To advance the understanding of fungi in ecosystem health and sustainability
- To develop innovative fungal-based solutions for environmental remediation
- To increase public awareness of the ecological significance of fungi

Tools and Technologies:

- Portable microscopes and lab equipment
- GIS software for ecological mapping
- Statistical analysis tools (R, Python)
- Environmental monitoring sensors
- DNA sequencing tools

Responsibilities:

- Conducts field studies to collect and analyze fungal samples
- Researches the ecological roles of fungi in various environments
- Develops methods for using fungi in environmental remediation
- Publishes research findings in scientific journals
- Collaborates with environmental organizations on conservation efforts
- Educates the public and stakeholders on the importance of fungi

Challenges:

- Obtaining funding and resources for extensive field research
- Navigating logistical challenges of conducting research in remote locations
- Communicating complex scientific concepts to a broader audience

Needs:

- Access to advanced field research equipment and lab facilities
- Platforms for sharing and collaborating on research with other scientists
- Funding for long-term ecological studies and environmental projects

Dr. Michael Brown - Persona

Age

55

Job Title

Industrial Mycologist

Education

- Ph.D. in Biotechnology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
- M. Sc Biochimie Sorbonne University
- B. Sc Biochemistry University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Experience:

- Over 20 years in industrial mycology and biotechnology
- Published extensively in leading scientific and industrial journals
- Led several high-profile industrial research projects

Goals:

- To innovate new fungal-based materials and products for industrial use
- To streamline and optimize production processes involving fungi
- To contribute to sustainable industrial practices through fungal applications

Tools and Technologies:

- Bioreactors for large-scale cultivation
- Genetic sequencing and editing toolsIndustrial fermentation equipment
- Data analysis and management software
- Laboratory automation systems

Responsibilities:

- Conducts research on the scalability of fungal cultivation
- Leads and manages industrial research projects
- Collaborates with engineers to integrate fungal technologies into production lines
- Publishes research findings and presents at industry conferences

Challenges:

- Ensuring the scalability of lab results to industrial levels
- Maintaining consistency and quality in fungal-based products
- Securing funding and resources for large-scale projects

Needs:

- Robust industrial-grade lab equipment
- Advanced software for monitoring and optimizing fungal growth
- Strong collaboration with engineering and production teams

Alex Morgan's Journey

Petricor - User Journey
Aspect Awareness Research Evaluation Decision Implementation Planning Installation & Setup Training Operational Use Monitoring & Optimization Maintenance Review & Feedback
Actions Dr. Alex Morgan recognizes inefficiencies in the current manual fungal analysis process and starts exploring automation options. Alex researches various automated systems, reads reviews, attends product demos, and consults with peers in the industry. Alex evaluates Petricor's features, checks integration capabilities, calculates ROI, and requests detailed demos and trial runs. Based on comprehensive features and positive feedback from trials, Alex decides to implement Petricor. Develops a detailed implementation plan, allocates the budget, and sets timelines for the installation of Petricor. Installs Petricor hardware, sets up software, and configures the system settings. Conducts comprehensive training sessions for lab personnel and provides detailed user manuals and support. Starts using Petricor for daily operations, monitors performance, and troubleshoots issues. Continuously monitors system performance, updates software, and optimizes workflows. Schedules regular maintenance checks, updates software, and replaces parts as needed. Collects feedback from users, reviews performance data, and makes necessary adjustments.
Thoughts & Feelings Frustrated by the time-consuming nature and potential for human error in manual processes. Eager to find a reliable automated solution. Curious about the potential solutions and hopeful that an effective system can be found. Cautious about the reliability and cost of new systems. Analytical and critical, focusing on ensuring Petricor's efficiency and compatibility with the lab's existing systems. Confident in the decision, looking forward to improvements in lab efficiency and accuracy. Organized and strategic, ensuring that all aspects of the implementation are thoroughly planned. Excited about the new system but cautious about potential setup challenges. Engaged and eager to learn; initial learning curve expected. Relief from reduced manual workload; increased efficiency and accuracy in results. Confident in system reliability; proactive in addressing any minor issues that arise. Secure in the system's reliability; ensuring longevity and consistent performance. Satisfied with improvements; open to further enhancements and updates.
Pain Points Time-consuming manual processes; high potential for human error. Information overload; difficulty in comparing features of different systems. Concerns about integration with current lab infrastructure and data systems. Initial investment cost and the time required for full implementation. Coordinating with multiple stakeholders and managing budget constraints. Technical issues during setup and ensuring compatibility with existing lab systems. Resistance to change from some lab staff; ensuring comprehensive understanding. Initial minor issues with system operation; ongoing support needs. Ensuring continuous system updates and addressing any bugs or issues. Scheduling downtime for maintenance; managing maintenance costs. Gathering comprehensive feedback; implementing necessary changes based on feedback.
Goals Improve the accuracy and efficiency of microbial analysis through automation. Find a reliable, cost-effective automated system that integrates well with existing lab workflows. Ensure Petricor meets all lab requirements and provides a good return on investment. Choose the best system that fits the lab's needs and budget constraints. Seamlessly integrate Petricor into lab workflows and systems. Successfully install and set up Petricor without disrupting lab operations. Ensure all lab personnel are adequately trained to use Petricor effectively. Efficient daily use of Petricor with minimal manual intervention. Maintain optimal efficiency and accuracy of Petricor. Ensure long-term reliability and performance of Petricor. Continuously improve Petricor's performance and user satisfaction.
Objective
Activities:
Output:
Feedback
Generate ideas and potential solutions to address identified problems and needs.
Brainstorming sessions, sketching, creating wireframes, and developing low-fidelity prototypes.
Initial design concepts, wireframes, and user flow diagrams.
Encourage a collaborative environment where ideas are freely shared. Use techniques like Crazy Eights or mind mapping to expand the ideation process.

Manual vs Automated Lab Process

Manual vs Automated Lab Process
Aspect Time Efficiency Accuracy and Consistency Data Recording Colony Counting Identification Documentation and Reporting Quality Control Sterilization Data Analysis Peer Review/Verification Overall Efficiency Cost Efficiency Scalability
Manual Process 37-70 hours (excluding incubation) Subject to human error and variability Manual entry, prone to errors Time-consuming and error-prone Requires skilled personnel, time-intensive Manual documentation, time-consuming Manual quality checks, potential for oversight Manual sterilization, time-consuming Manual statistical analysis, time-consuming Manual review, potential for delays Labor-intensive and time-consuming High labor costs, potential for increased errors Limited scalability due to manual processes
Automated Process 3.5-6 hours (excluding incubation) High accuracy and consistency due to automated, standardized procedures Automated recording, integrated with LIMS Fast and accurate colony counting using image processing software AI and ML algorithms for rapid identification Automated generation of reports Continuous monitoring and calibration of automated systems Automated sterilization of equipment Automated statistical analysis and trend identification Automated alerts and cross-checking Highly efficient, minimal manual intervention Initial investment in automation, but lower long-term operational costs Easily scalable to handle large volumes of samples
Advantage Significant reduction in time required for analysis, allowing for higher throughput Reduced error rates and variability, ensuring reliable results Accurate and consistent data entry, easy data management Rapid and precise counting, saving time and improving accuracy Faster and more accurate identification, less reliance on highly skilled personnel Instantaneous report generation, reducing administrative workload Enhanced quality control, ensuring high reliability and accuracy Ensures consistent and thorough sterilization, saving time Efficient data analysis, providing deeper insights and quicker results Streamlined peer review process, ensuring timely verification and validation Frees up scientists' time for other tasks, increases overall laboratory productivity Cost savings over time due to reduced labor and increased efficiency Greater ability to scale operations, meeting higher demand without proportional increase in labor

High Level Product Journey

High-Level Product Journey
Aspect Awareness Research Evaluation Decision Implement & Planning Installation & Setup Training Operational Use Monitoring & Optimization Maintenance Review & Feedback
Problem Manual processes are time-consuming, prone to error, and inefficient for high-throughput fungal analysis. Need to find a reliable and comprehensive automated system for fungal and mold analysis. Comparing features, reliability, and cost-effectiveness of different systems. Selecting the best automated system that meets lab requirements and budget constraints. Planning the integration of Petricor into existing lab workflows and systems. Integrating Petricor into the lab infrastructure and ensuring all systems are compatible. Ensuring all lab personnel are adequately trained to use Petricor effectively. Transitioning from manual to automated processes using Petricor for fungal and mold analysis. Ensuring Petricor operates at optimal efficiency and addressing any operational issues. Regular maintenance of Petricor to ensure long-term reliability and performance. Assessing the overall impact of Petricor on lab operations and identifying areas for further improvement.
Action Laboratory managers and microbiologists identify the need for automation to improve efficiency and accuracy. Research various automated systems, read reviews, attend demos, and consult with peers. Evaluate Petricor's features, integration capabilities, and ROI. Request for detailed demos and trial runs. Decision-makers choose Petricor based on its comprehensive features and positive feedback from trials. Develop an implementation plan, allocate budget, and set timelines. Install hardware, set up software, and configure settings. Conduct training sessions and provide comprehensive user manuals and support. Start using Petricor for daily operations, monitor performance, and troubleshoot issues. Continuously monitor system performance, update software, and optimize workflows. Schedule regular maintenance checks, update software, and replace parts as needed. Collect feedback from users, review performance data, and make necessary adjustments.
Experience Frustration with current manual processes; eagerness to find a reliable solution. Curious and hopeful about potential solutions; cautious about reliability and cost. Analytical and critical; seeking assurance of Petricor's efficiency and compatibility with existing systems. Confident in their choice; anticipating improvements in lab efficiency and accuracy. Organized and strategic; ensuring all aspects of implementation are covered. Excited yet cautious; monitoring progress and resolving initial setup challenges. Engaged and eager to learn; initial learning curve expected. Relief from reduced manual workload; increased efficiency and accuracy in results. Confident in system reliability; proactive in addressing any minor issues that arise. Secure in the system's reliability; ensuring longevity and consistent performance. Satisfied with improvements; open to further enhancements and updates.
Buying Stakeholders Lab Directors, Research Heads Lab Directors, Research Heads Lab Directors, Research Heads Lab Directors, Research Heads, Financial Officers Lab Directors, Research Heads, Financial Officers Lab Directors, Research Heads Lab Directors, Research Heads Training Coordinators, Lab Directors Lab Managers, Senior Microbiologists Lab Managers, Senior Microbiologists Lab Directors, Research Heads
Implementation Stakeholders Procurement Team, IT Department Procurement Team, IT Department IT Department, Lab Managers, Senior Microbiologists Procurement Team, IT Department IT Department, Lab Managers, Senior Microbiologists IT Department, Lab Managers, Senior Microbiologists IT Department, Lab Managers, Senior Microbiologists, Petricor Trainers IT Department, Lab Managers, Lab Technicians IT Department, Lab Managers, Lab Technicians IT Department, Maintenance Team Lab Managers, Senior Microbiologists
Lab Staff Involved Microbiologists, Lab Technicians Microbiologists, Lab Technicians Microbiologists, Lab Technicians Microbiologists, Lab Technicians Microbiologists, Lab Technicians Microbiologists, Lab Technicians Microbiologists, Lab Technicians Microbiologists, Lab Technicians Microbiologists, Lab Technicians Microbiologists, Lab Technicians Microbiologists, Lab Technicians

UI Inspiration Imagery

ID Inspiration Imagery

High Level App UX - Lab Tech UX

The lab technician app workflow starts with logging in and selecting tasks like Sample Preparation, Incubation, Imaging, Analysis, or Reporting from the main dashboard.

The Reporting task allows users to select data, generate customized reports, and export or send these reports as needed. After completing any task, the user is directed back to the home screen to select additional tasks or log out. This structured and intuitive workflow ensures that technicians can efficiently manage their duties, from sample handling to detailed analysis and reporting, all within a cohesive app interface. The design emphasizes ease of use, with clear steps and minimal complexity, enhancing productivity and accuracy in the laboratory setting.

High Level On-Device UX - Lab Tech

The workflow begins with the user powering on the device, initializing it, and selecting tasks from the home screen such as loading petri dishes, capturing images, barcoding samples, and sending data to the app.

For barcoding samples, the device attaches barcodes to the petri dishes, and the user verifies and confirms the attachment. The final task involves reviewing the collected data and sending it to the connected app, confirming the successful data transfer. After completing the necessary tasks, the user returns to the home screen and can either select additional tasks or power off the device. This structured workflow ensures that lab technicians can efficiently handle the preparation, imaging, barcoding, and data transfer of fungal petri dishes within a cohesive and user-friendly interface.

Objective
Activities:
Output:
Feedback
Validate design concepts and assumptions with real users.
Usability testing (moderated or unmoderated), A/B testing, user feedback sessions, and heuristic evaluations.
Usability test reports, user feedback summaries, and performance metrics.
Focus on identifying pain points, usability issues, and areas for improvement. Use both qualitative and quantitative methods for a holistic view.
Lab Technician Feature Ranking

Lab Technician Feature Ranking

Rank Feature
1 Sample Preparation
2 Incubation Monitoring
3 Data Analysis
4 Imaging
5 Reporting
6 Calibration of Equipment
7 System Maintenance
8 Training and Skill Development
Top 50 Research Fungi

Top 50 Research Fungi

The following ranking of the top 50 research fungi has been determined based on the frequency of mentions in scientific journals, the impact of these fungi on various industries, and their significance in ongoing research. For further details, you can refer to the specific research journals cited in the source column. The methodology used for this ranking can be found here.

Rank Species Type Color Size Source
1 Amanita muscaria Fungi Red with white spots Medium Research Journal A
2 Penicillium Mold Green/Blue Small Research Journal B
3 Aspergillus Mold Black Small Research Journal C
4 Boletus edulis Fungi Brown Large Research Journal D
5 Trichoderma Mold Green Small Research Journal E
6 Fusarium Mold Pink Small Research Journal F
7 Cladosporium Mold Olive Small Research Journal G
8 Rhizopus Mold Black Small Research Journal H
9 Alternaria Mold Dark Small Research Journal I
10 Candida Fungi White Medium Research Journal J
11 Cryptococcus Fungi Yellow Medium Research Journal K
12 Malassezia Fungi White Small Research Journal L
13 Basidiobolus Fungi Brown Medium Research Journal M
14 Sporothrix Fungi White Small Research Journal N
15 Geotrichum Fungi White Small Research Journal O
16 Microsporum Fungi White Small Research Journal P
17 Epidermophyton Fungi Yellow Small Research Journal Q
18 Mucor Mold White Small Research Journal R
19 Rhizoctonia Mold Brown Small Research Journal S
20 Pyricularia Mold Gray Small Research Journal T
21 Ustilago Fungi Black Medium Research Journal U
22 Puccinia Fungi Brown Small Research Journal V
23 Phytophthora Mold Brown Small Research Journal W
24 Pythium Mold White Small Research Journal X
25 Sclerotinia Mold Black Small Research Journal Y
26 Fusarium solani Mold Red Small Research Journal Z
27 Aspergillus niger Mold Black Small Research Journal AA
28 Aspergillus flavus Mold Yellow Small Research Journal AB
29 Aspergillus fumigatus Mold Green Small Research Journal AC
30 Penicillium chrysogenum Mold Blue/Green Small Research Journal AD
31 Penicillium roqueforti Mold Blue/Green Small Research Journal AE
32 Penicillium expansum Mold Blue/Green Small Research Journal AF
33 Penicillium glaucum Mold Blue/Green Small Research Journal AG
34 Trichophyton Fungi White Small Research Journal AH
35 Neurospora Mold Pink Small Research Journal AI
36 Beauveria Fungi White Small Research Journal AJ
37 Entomophthora Fungi White Small Research Journal AK
38 Chytridiomycota Fungi Transparent Small Research Journal AL
39 Blastocladiomycota Fungi Transparent Small Research Journal AM
40 Zygomycota Fungi Black Small Research Journal AN
41 Glomeromycota Fungi Black Small Research Journal AO
42 Myxomycota Fungi Yellow Small Research Journal AP
43 Oomycota Mold Transparent Small Research Journal AQ
44 Hypocreales Fungi White Small Research Journal AR
45 Eurotiales Fungi White Small Research Journal AS
46 Phallales Fungi Yellow Medium Research Journal AT
47 Boletales Fungi Brown Large Research Journal AU
48 Agaricales Fungi White Medium Research Journal AV
49 Polyporales Fungi Brown Large Research Journal AW
50 Cantharellales Fungi Yellow Medium Research Journal AX
Fungus Image Analysis

Fungus Image Analysis

Image Details

Color Range
Analysis
Web References

Other analysis options go here...

Prototype

Objective
Activities:
Output:
Feedback
Improve the design based on user feedback and testing results.
Iterating on designs, improving wireframes and prototypes, and enhancing interaction and visual design.
Updated wireframes, high-fidelity prototypes, and design specifications.
Prioritize changes based on impact and feasibility. Ensure the refined designs address the issues identified in the testing phase.

Components and Brand

Objective
Activities:
Output:
Feedback
Continuously gather feedback from users and stakeholders.
Monitoring user behavior, collecting feedback through surveys and analytics, and conducting regular user interviews.
Ongoing user feedback, analytics reports, and insights for further improvement.
Establish channels for continuous feedback, such as in-app feedback tools or regular user forums. Listen actively to both positive and negative feedback.

Hardware Design And On-Device UI

The Petricor fungi analysis system is compact, ergonomic, and built for a laboratory setting.

The device has a low-profile appearance with smooth edges and a minimalistic aesthetic. It includes an enclosed chamber with a transparent door, allowing visibility of the six petri dishes inside, which are laid flat to ensure even processing and imaging.

Additionally, there is an integrated barcode printer slot adjacent to the touchscreen, designed for printing barcodes to attach to the petri dishes. And there is a scanner device on the right hand side for tracking additional samples.

The on-device workflows streamline the management of fungi experiment sampling.

Key workflows include Sample and Image Collection, Barcode Printing and Scanning, and Chamber Monitoring and Control. They ensure efficient preparation, error reduction, and enhance sample traceability.

Petricor Cloud

The Petricor Cloud platform revolutionizes fungal research and diagnostics by offering a comprehensive, cloud-based solution for data analysis, storage, and collaboration.

By integrating advanced imaging technologies with powerful analytical tools, Petricor Cloud allows researchers to capture, analyze, and share detailed insights into fungal colonies seamlessly. The platform’s hyperspectral imaging capabilities enable precise identification of fungal species, while real-time data processing and automated reporting streamline the workflow, reducing the time and effort required for manual analysis. This enhances accuracy and efficiency, empowering researchers to focus on critical tasks and accelerating scientific discoveries.